Given all the recent activity on the bb, this could almost be construed as 'off-topic' !!
As part of my research I looked at p/b ratio of RRL, not exactly rocket science or 100% reliable for this sector, but would be interesting to compare to other small-cap oilers if anyone has worked out similar?
I've updated this to recent information:
Market cap at 884m shares, so at 3.75pps - £34.476m GBP
Assets:
Texas - US$226m - £155m GBP (from reserve report)
Georgia - US$105m - £72m GBP (pre-seismics valuation 2008)
Puntland - A$83m - £47m GBP (est. asset sale value stated in accounts)
Financial assets - A$1.5m - £0.9m GBP (from accounts)
Total assets £274.9m GBP
Liabilities:
Borrowings - A$3m - £1.75m GBP
Texas - £0 (all paid)
Georgia - £5.6m GBP (based on dilution effect of 70m shares and 70m options total)
Georgia - US$6m [Phase II commitments] - £4.1m GBP
Puntland - £2.2m GBP (based on dilution effect of 45m shares and 11.25m options)
Puntland - US$20m [payable after 1st 4 wells] - £13.8m GBP
Total liabilities - £27.45m GBP
Net asset value (NAV) of £247.45m GBP
That is therefore 34.476m divided by 247.45 giving a P/B ratio of 0.139, meaning that at 3.75p we are trading at just 13.9% of our NAV.
That either means it's unbelievably undervalued, or something is fundamentally wrong with the company, and if you've done your research then you'll know it's not the latter...!
All this is my own research and may mean b*ll*cks-all to anyone else, but thought I would share this with you to distract from the 'bell-ends' and other derampers.
FYI, my research (and also thanks to iPedro's useful NAV spreadsheet) re. potential of Puntland estimated a NAV of £1.15 billion GBP, with just 500mmbbls P1 ........ (now compare that to current value of £47m!)
If anyone has worked out p/b on other oileys, it would be v.interesting to see the ratios.
Best of luck all holders, Diamond